Aviksis vs Murray (tenant Guarantors not responsible for landlord’s attorney’s fees even if tenant responsible)

MY SUMMARY AND COMMENTS: Aviksis was the landlord and Murray was the father of the tenant. Murray signed as a Guarantor guaranteeing that he would pay if his son did any damages. In this case the anti-landlord Appeals Court of Continue reading Aviksis vs Murray (tenant Guarantors not responsible for landlord’s attorney’s fees even if tenant responsible)

Commonwealth v Keramaris (an ad may be discriminatory and unfair and deceptive but no 93A if no actual injury)

SUMMARY This was one those cases where the overzealous Attorney General of MA Martha Coakley (she is no longer the AG) was bragging about and pointing as one the largest payouts by a single landlord regarding a Craigslist ad. This Continue reading Commonwealth v Keramaris (an ad may be discriminatory and unfair and deceptive but no 93A if no actual injury)

South Commons Condo Association vs. The City of Springfield and Charlie Arment Trucking (The Government can demolish your building without a warning in case of “emergency”)

  SUMMARY: This case was released on 12-23-14 by the Federal Appeals Court for the State of MA. The day after the 2011 tornado that hit Springfield, the City of Springfield demolished the South Commons Condos without warning. The owners Continue reading South Commons Condo Association vs. The City of Springfield and Charlie Arment Trucking (The Government can demolish your building without a warning in case of “emergency”)

Posted in LAW

BARRON CHIROPRACTIC & REHABILITATION, P.C. vs. NORFOLK & DEDHAM GROUP (You have the right not to accept settlement with an insurance company and continue your lawsuit against them so they can cover your attorney fees and other costs if you win)

SUMMARY: If an insurer has not paid your benefits within 30 days of when those benefits became due and payable, then you can sue them for breach of contract. If an insurer offers you to settle before trial and you Continue reading BARRON CHIROPRACTIC & REHABILITATION, P.C. vs. NORFOLK & DEDHAM GROUP (You have the right not to accept settlement with an insurance company and continue your lawsuit against them so they can cover your attorney fees and other costs if you win)

Posted in LAW