2013 Klairmont v Gainsboro Restaurant (a judge can ignore a jury verdict using 93A on the same set of facts)
Lisa KLAIRMONT & another, [FN1] administrators, [FN2] vs. GAINSBORO RESTAURANT, INC., [FN3] and others. [FN4] SJC-11154. Suffolk. January 7, 2013. – May 16, 2013. Consumer Protection Act, Unfair or deceptive act, Availability of remedy, Damages, Attorney’s fees, Jury trial. Continue reading 2013 Klairmont v Gainsboro Restaurant (a judge can ignore a jury verdict using 93A on the same set of facts)